Answer: Thanks for your
question. There aren't many statistics that I know of that
relate to your question but I'll try to help you the best I can.
Prior to 1971 (pre Title IX) the number of boys participating in high
school
sports nationally was 3,666,917 compared to just 294,015 girls (from the
1995 National Federation of State High School Association).
In 1994-95, the number of boy participants remained about the
same;
3,536,359. But the number of girls playing sports had skyrocketed to 2,240,461. With
the increase in female participation came a large number of highly competitive parents with huge expectations for their daughters.
Prior to 1971, most parents of young female athletes had little
interest in
athletic careers or athletic opportunities for their daughters. Parents of
boys typically have had high expectations of their sons. This parental
involvement in boys sports started after the war (WWII) with the startup of
organized sports, Little League baseball in particular.
Over the years college scholarships became more and more important and
professional salaries were increasing dramatically. As a result parents became very demanding of their sons. Not so for girls from 1945-1971.
Prior
to 1971 there weren't many girls sports at the high school level and there
were practically none at the organized youth sport level. As a
result,
expectations were minimal and parents didn't pressure their girls to
participate or to excel in the few sports available. The opportunities
just weren't there for girls in large numbers.
From my observations that all changed when girls started playing sports in
high school in 1971 and the years that followed. These days schools are required to offer an equal number of sports programs to boys and girls.
Most
college have top level sports programs and recruit girls as well as boys.
Now both boys and girls are under extreme pressure to excel, to win a
scholarship and hopefully sign a lucrative professional contract.
I don't believe that girls feel pressured to any significant extent to
compete equally with boys for recognition or for status, nor do their
parents expect that. This is because there are so many sports
opportunities
available now for females to compete against other females and
the recognition or rewards are big and getting bigger.
Girls do however have considerable pressure on them to excel against
opponents of their own sex because of these new opportunities that have
become available and the attraction of a big money payday the high revenue
sports represent. Female tennis players, for example are pushed just as
hard by their parents as the male counterparts. This pressure can be from
either
parent, mom or dad. We've all heard about Mary Pierce's problems with her
highly competitive, aggressive and combative father.
Demanding, even abusive, parents are everywhere in youth sports today.
They
are there in both male and female competitive events.
I believe, as a general rule, at the youth sport level (about ages 6-12) boys are more wrapped up or concerned with winning and are more concerned
about losing than girls. Girls usually want to play a sport for the fun
and
the social interactions that it provides and don't "suffer" as
much as boys
do with losing. As a result there may be a little less inherent pressure (not parent imposed) for the girls who play a sport.
But too many
parents
today make a youngster's youth sport experience a high
pressure, win at all cost event. Fun and total participation are fast disappearing from the
youth sports scene for both boys and girls. Unfortunately the parents and
the coaches are usually the root cause of the trouble.
Most of this is my opinion which is based on observations and personal
experiences from more than 50 years of coaching boys and girls. I hope
that
it helps to answer your question. Good luck in your research. Get
back to
me if I can clarify anything or if I should add something that you think
is pertinent.